Quick academic help
Don't let the stress of school get you down! Have your essay written by a professional writer before the deadline arrives.
When Should You Hire A Criminal Defense Lawyer.
It might also be argued, however, that the line of thought sketchedabove begins in the wrong place. It begins with a supposedlypre-legal, perhaps even pre-political category of wrongdoing, and thenasks how we can determine which kinds of wrong within that (verylarge) category we have reason to criminalize; one answer to thatquestion is that we have reason to criminalize those wrongs that countas ‘public’. Now there is room for argument about the verypossibility of such a starting point (see Farmer 2010); but even if itis possible, it might be the wrong place to start. Perhaps, takingseriously the political character of criminal law as a stateinstitution, we should instead begin with the ‘public’:with an account of the state and its proper aims, and of theinstitutions that should be created and maintained to serve those aimsfor different versions of this suggestion (see Thorburn 2011a, 2011b;Farmer forthcoming); or with an account of the political community and itsshared or civic life (see Duff forthcoming). We might then still insist thatthe criminal law's proper purpose is to define, and to provide for anappropriate response to, certain kinds of wrong: but those wrongs willnow be identified within, and take their criminalizable character fromtheir place within, the political and institutional structure of thepolity.
To this end, criminal law justice provides that the person alleging the commission of a crime must proof beyond reasonable doubt that the accused person(s) possessed mens rea, if the court is to hold a criminal liability against the accused.
The Theory and Practice of International Criminal Law | Brill
Why should we maintain an institution that speaks to its citizens insuch terms of wrongs that should not be committed? Part of the reasonis obviously to dissuade the citizens (if they need dissuading) fromcommitting such wrongs—that is the truth in the instrumentalistview. Indeed, nothing said so far rules out the familiar suggestionthat a central purpose of a system of criminal law is to reduce theincidence of the relevant kinds of wrongdoing by threatening those whomight commit them with punishments that will deter them—whetherpunishment should be justified as a deterrent is a further issue. Butthis is not to say that instrumentalists are wholly right, or thatMoore is wholly wrong to think that the sole purpose of criminal law isto provide for the retributive punishment of those who culpably commitsuch wrongs. For, first, even if we are in the end justified in usingpunishment as a deterrent for those who will not otherwise be dissuadedfrom crime, the law's initial appeal to the citizens must be in themoral language of wrongdoing, not simply in the coercive language ofdeterrence (see Legal Punishment, s. 6): not because such amoral appeal is likely to be instrumentally effective, but because itis intrinsically appropriate to the law's dealings with the citizens ofa liberal polity. Second, we can now plausibly suggest that anotherpurpose of the criminal law is to provide a suitable response tocriminal wrongs that are committed. It publicly recognises and condemnsthem as wrongs by defining them as crimes; it calls those who arealleged to have committed them to account, to answer for that allegedwrongdoing, through a process of criminal trials; it condemns those whoare proved to have committed such wrongs by convicting them—and bypunishing them, if we understand punishment as involving thecommunication of censure (see again Legal Punishment, s. 6).The truth in Moore's view is that such responses to crime are justifiednot merely as instrumentally efficient means to the reduction ofharmful conduct, or to other further ends, but as intrinsicallyappropriate responses to the kinds of wrongdoing that properly concernthe criminal law. We must take such wrongdoing seriously, if we takeseriously the values against which it offends, the victim's standing asone who has suffered such a wrong, and the wrongdoer's standing as aresponsible agent who has done wrong: but to take it seriously is to beprepared to declare it to be wrong it, and to call to account and tocondemn those who engage in it.
I have suggested in this section the central purpose ofcriminal law, as a distinctive kind of law marked out from theother kinds and aspects of law by the features discussed in s. 2, is todefine, and to declare the wrongfulness of, certain kinds ofwrongdoing, in order not only to dissuade citizens from committing suchwrongs, but also to provide appropriate responses to those who commit,or are alleged to have committed, such wrongs. In defining conduct ascriminal, the law identifies it as conduct from which we have goodreason to refrain, and thus also as conduct for which we will be calledto public account, and condemned and punished, if we engage in it. Toask whether we should have a system of criminal law is therefore to askwhether there are kinds of wrongdoing that the state should identifyand respond to in such a way—kinds of wrongdoing that the stateshould take seriously as wrongdoing, and expect its citizens to takesimilarly seriously.
Recent Development of International Criminal Law ..
‘Theories of criminal law’ could just be generaltheories of law applied to the particular case of criminal law:proponents of legal positivism, of natural law, of economic analysis oflaw, of Critical Legal Studies and other schools of legal theory willexpect to be able to say about the criminal law what they say about lawin general (for examples of the last two approaches, see Posner 1985;Kelman 1981). Questions raised by theories of this kind will figure inwhat follows—for instance whether it is part of the essence ofcriminal law that it must satisfy, or make, certain kinds of moraldemand; whether criminal law can be adequately understood in purelyinstrumental terms; whether we should take the criminal law's apparentpretensions to rationality and principle seriously, or should rathersee it as an oppressive exercise of political or economic power, or asthe site of conflicts which produce an irredeemably contradictory,unprincipled set of doctrines and norms (see Norrie 2001). Suchquestions are important, but we will not begin with them. We should,instead, begin by asking what is distinctive about criminallaw. What marks it out from other kinds or aspects of law? What are itsdistinctive institutional structures, purposes, or content?
Philosophical theories of criminal law can be analytical, ornormative (see Husak 1987: 20–26). Analytical theorists seek toexplain the concept of criminal law, and related concepts suchas—most obviously—that of crime (metaphysically moreambitious theorists might seek an account not merely of the concept ofcriminal law, but of its real, metaphysical nature; see Moore 1997:18–30). They need not look for a strict, ahistoricaldefinition—an account of the necessary and sufficient conditionsgiven, and only given, which a human practice counts as a system ofcriminal law; we have no reason to think that any such definition willbe available. But they can hope to identify and explain the central orsalient features of systems of criminal law—features at leastsome of which will be exhibited by anything we can count as a systemof criminal law; and to develop an account of a paradigm of criminallaw, on the basis of which we can recognise as systems of criminal lawother practices that resemble that paradigm sufficiently closely, eventhough they do not quite fit it.
Why choose our assistance?
As soon as we have completed your work, it will be proofread and given a thorough scan for plagiarism.
Our clients' personal information is kept confidential, so rest assured that no one will find out about our cooperation.
We write everything from scratch. You'll be sure to receive a plagiarism-free paper every time you place an order.
We will complete your paper on time, giving you total peace of mind with every assignment you entrust us with.
Want something changed in your paper? Request as many revisions as you want until you're completely satisfied with the outcome.
We're always here to help you solve any possible issue. Feel free to give us a call or write a message in chat.
law English criminal law Crime Provocation Evidence law Murder ..
The regime of any country that regulates and implement policy; can cause a fundamental or detrimental changes from within the criminal justice, educational institution, health care system and employment legislation.
Free criminal law Essays and Papers | page 3
At the moment, the criminal justice system is based on retributive justice over restorative justice; this is where a lawbreaker receives punishment in proportion to the crime inflicted (Milovanovic, 2007) and is given back what they have given the victim: harm (Koneke, 2011)....
Sample Criminal Law Essay on Criminology- Free Essays …
Ashworth 2009, Simester et al. 2010, and Wells & Quick 2010 areuseful introductory texts on criminal law; Duff & Green 2011 is agood collection of philosophical essays.
The criminal law essay on criminology here is a good sample ..
Third, the borders between criminal law and other modes of legalregulation or control are being increasingly eroded by practices of‘preventive justice’. Instead of directly criminalizingconduct that brings about (or increases the risk of) a relevant kindof mischief, and convicting and punishing those who engage in suchconduct, governments seek more effective ways of preventing suchconduct by imposing legal constraints on those thought likely toengage in it—constraints that are often themselves backed by thecriminal law, in that it becomes a criminal offence to violatethem. Good examples of such measures are the Antisocial BehaviourOrders that English courts can impose on those accused of variouskinds of antisocial conduct (due to be replaced by Criminal BehaviourOrders), and the various restrictive orders that courts can impose onthose suspected of involvement in terrorist activity (see TerrorismPrevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011). The structure of thiskind of provision is that there is an initial, formally non-criminalprocess, in which a court is given reason to believe that a person hasbeen engaged in, and/or is likely in the future to engage in, somekind of undesirable, usually criminal, activity (antisocial behaviour;terrorism), and that it is necessary to subject him to restrictions inorder to prevent (or to reduce the risk of) future behaviour of thatkind. The court can then impose a range of restrictions: on where theperson may go or when he may travel (including imposing a curfew), onwhom he may meet, and on a range of activities in which he mightotherwise engage. Once the restrictive order is made, it is a criminaloffence to breach it. A normative theory of criminal law must alsohave something to say about these kinds of measure. Are they, or canthey be rendered, consistent with the principles of justice andlegality that are supposed to structure the criminal law; or do theymark the subversion of those principles in the interests of effectiveprevention? (See generally Ashworth and Zedner 2010, 2011, 2012;Ramsay 2012; Ashworth, Zedner and Tomlin 2013.)
How it works
You submit your order instructions
We assign an appropriate expert
The expert takes care of your task
We send it to you upon completion
Average quality score
"I have always been impressed by the quick turnaround and your thoroughness. Easily the most professional essay writing service on the web."
"Your assistance and the first class service is much appreciated. My essay reads so well and without your help I'm sure I would have been marked down again on grammar and syntax."
"Thanks again for your excellent work with my assignments. No doubts you're true experts at what you do and very approachable."
"Very professional, cheap and friendly service. Thanks for writing two important essays for me, I wouldn't have written it myself because of the tight deadline."
"Thanks for your cautious eye, attention to detail and overall superb service. Thanks to you, now I am confident that I can submit my term paper on time."
"Thank you for the GREAT work you have done. Just wanted to tell that I'm very happy with my essay and will get back with more assignments soon."